Archive for grassroots journalism

Citizen Media: where are we? Dan Gillmor does a wonderful job of distilling and identifying the state of citizen media which keeps growing and broadening its interest at a relentless pace. Photo credit: Ophelia Cherry In this article Dan published just a few days ago, he not only outlines with insight the many developments, successes and failures occurred in the citizen media universe, but he also underlines and compares such developments with the parallel free-fall experienced by traditional media. Even independents who have repeatedly failed to listen and look at the changing rules of the vast media landscape are now paying an increasingly high price to their own lack of analysis. But the good news is that the grassroots inspired …

The very broad and pervasive emergence of web-based image sharing marketplaces (such as photo sharing sites and online free photo archives) has rapidly revolutionized the traditional photo agency market making it increasingly difficult for the many small picture and photography agencies to compete with the many free image sharing alternatives and powerful web-based stock image services available today out there. Photo credit: Maxim Kulemza Finding images with the help of the Internet has become such a different activity from what many advertisers and publishers have known for many years. Instead of having to stand in front of a light table checking out hundreds of 35mm slides to select the few that fit the assignment, today picture editors and independent writers …

This is the news indeed: Congress is considering sending critics to jail, and in particular it places it focus for preventive action on what should be the very source of government dissent and criticism in any democratic country: the grassroots.

While not yet an official law, this is indeed the meat of the new legislation currently being considered by the US Congress to regulate grassroots communications.

silence_by_Rivello.jpg
Photo credit: (c) Rivello

In what appears one of the darkest moments in history of the United States, the U. S. Senate appears to be close to impose criminal penalties and even jail time, on “grassroots causes” and “citizens who criticize Congress”.

Here the details:

Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before the Senate, would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters, to register and report quarterly to Congress the same as the big K Street lobbyists.

Section 220, of the ‘Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007’ would amend existing lobbying reporting law by creating the most expansive intrusion on First Amendment rights ever.

For the first time in history, critics of Congress will need to register and report with Congress itself.

A week ago, on January 9th 2007, the Senate passed Amendment 7 to S. 1, to create criminal penalties, including civil fines of up to $100,000 and up to one year in jail, if someone ‘knowingly and willingly fails to file or report.’

The bill would require reporting of ‘paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying,’ but defines ‘paid’ merely as communications to 500 or more members of the public, with no other qualifiers.

US Senator Vitter (R-LA), however, is now a co-sponsor of Amendment 20 by Senator Robert Bennett (R-UT) to remove Section 220 from the bill. Unless Amendment 20 succeeds, the Senate will have criminalized the exercise of First Amendment rights.

According to multiple reports available online, the new legislation would regulate small, legitimate nonprofits, as well as bloggers and individuals, while simultaneously offering wide loopholes for corporations, unions, and large membership organizations that would be able to spend hundreds of millions of dollars, while not being forced to report about them.

Is the US getting into becoming a visible totalitarian state?

While the government says “no”, the simple facts in front of your eyes would seem to spell a different story.

Check and decide for yourself: Here are the common traits of popular totalitarian states drawn from the past governments of Germany (under the Nazis), Italy (under Mussolini), Spain (Franco), Indonesia (Suharto) and of some Latin American countries:

  1. Powerful and continuing nationalism: Totalitarian regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
  2. Disdain for the recognition of human rights: Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in totalitarian regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
  3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause: The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, Islamic terrorists, etc.
  4. Supremacy of the military: Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
  5. Rampant sexism: The governments of totalitarian nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under such regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.
  6. Controlled mass media: Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in wartime, is very common.
  7. Obsession with national security: Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
  8. Religion and government are intertwined: Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.
  9. Corporate power is protected: The industrial and business aristocracies of totalitarian (mostly fascist) nations often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
  10. Labor power is suppressed: Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
  11. Disdain for intellectuals and the arts: Totalitarian nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
  12. Obsession with crime and punishment: Under totalitarian regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in such nations.
  13. Rampant cronyism and corruption: Totalitarian (and in particular, fascist) regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in such regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
  14. Fraudulent elections: Sometimes elections in totalitarian nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Such totalitarian nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

How many of the above traits seem to be creeping or already part of the United States democracy in power today?

Outline of 14 totalitarian governments above excerpted from “The 14 Characteristics of Fascism” first published on globalresearch.ca by Lawrence Britt in Spring 2003 – I have willfully edited the word “fascist” in most instances and replaced it with the word “totalitarian” to provide greater access to the above from those with strong prejudices against the association of the word “fascist” with the government of the US.

Reference: PR Newswire story from Jan 16 2007, 06:34 PM