Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account

Archive for the 'Privacy and Security' Category

I shot the video interview that follows for the Frontiers of Interaction conference which took place yesterday in Turin, Italy. Superbly organized by Leandro Agrò and Matteo Penzo, the sold out event brought together high prestige names like sci-fi writer and visionary Bruce Sterling, Elizabeth Churchill Principal Research Scientist di Yahoo, Jeffrey Schnapp, Nicolas Nova, Ashley Benigno as well as a selected cream of Italian visionaries and technologists (Luca Mascaro, Fabrizio Capobianco, David Orban and several more).

Frontiers-of-Interaction-Howard-Rheingold.jpg

The focus of my questions in this video interview with Howard Rheingold, was kindly suggested by the event organizer Leandro Agrò, and they focused on:

a) the future of technology,

b) the speed at which things change,

c) who will eventually control the Internet,

d) what we can do about it, and

e) how pervasive technology will become in the next few years.

The Frontiers of Interaction event was mostly in English with some Italian language sessions. You can watch good quality recordings of most of yesterday sessions on Dolmedia Frontiers of Interaction page.

Here’s the integral unedited Howard Rheingold video interview (18 mins) as well as the entire English text transcript.

Interview With Howard Rheingold

Frontiers of Interaction - Turin - July 1 2008

Full English Text Transcript

Intro

Robin Good: Hi everyone here is Robin Good from Rome, Italy and I’m connecting with Howard Rheingold just off San Francisco bay. Good morning Howard!

Howard Rheingold: Good morning.

RG: How are you doing today?

Howard Rheingold: Excellent, it’s a shiny, beautiful day, I’m alive, what more can you have?

Speed of Change

Robin Good: …nothing really. We’re here for the Frontiers of Interaction fourth edition that is taking place in Turin and we’re offering the audience there the opportunity to reach out to Howard who’s one of the pioneers of cooperation, collaboration and the evolution of the use of media technologies from computers to the more pervasive mobile technologies that we are using at most every corner now. So Howard has been following this evolution by living inside the evolution, by participating in communities online and by writing, studying and learning from others as much as he could so I’ve got a few question that I’ve stammed from the theme of the interaction event that is taking place in Turin, and the first one is just really to warm up, I don’t know what you’re going to answer to this but the question is:

How speed is really getting in this future? Is it getting ahead of us, is it difficult to keep up ace with it, I mean as we’re trying to understand all that it changes it keeps changing faster. What reflections you have on this?

Howard Rheingold: What’s changing fast is the technology and the access to all kind of new media. We witnessed the fact that we are speaking through our computers, with computer cameras, on video…that’s no big deal for a lot of people now. It was pretty miracolous maybe impossible, just a few years ago, it’s just a huge proliferation of ways to communicate, devices…I think the big good news is what has been called the digital device really has been attacked by … We have cheap powerful chips that, I think at last counter was between a three and a half billion and four billion mobile phones in the world and at least a hundred million of those are cameras. I think it’s pretty clear that five years from now, ten years from now most people in the world will be carrying a device that will not only enable to speak on the telephone but access the Internet, to download and probably to upload and to stream video.

So a lot of the dreams of yesteryear are now in people’s pockets. I think the bad news, if you want to look at it that way, is that there are so many different ways to communicate. You’ve got forums, you’ve got Google groups or Yahoo groups, you got several different ways of communicating with video, you’ve got blogs, wikis, we’ve got Twitter, we’ve got instant messaging, we’ve got chat. now I think the divide is one of literacy, the device is not so much between the haves and the have-nots, in terms of having access to technology, but between the knows and the know-hows and the don’t-know-hows.

What you know and how you know, how to participate, and the on-going culture that’s being created upon access to many to many media, that really makes the difference and I don’t see our educational institutions or our parents keeping up with the pass of change.

I think parents are afraid to talk to their children about making moral choices, thinking critically about what they see online because they fear … their children no more than they do about the technology. At the same time we see this moral panics about what is happening online.

Then I think it’s a result of the larger society and a lot of mass media that communicate with that society. Also lagging behind their understanding of the media that are becoming available.

Who Will Control The Internet In The Future>?

Robin Good: Thank you Howard, very interesting answer. You opened up quite a bit of space and interesting themes there, but let me ask you: as far as the pervasive presence of the Internet, I have here a provoking question. Do you that given the first alerts of net neutrality or the big changes that are taking place in the world economy…I mean who do you think is going to be possibly ruling next if the Internet becomes more pervasive? Telcos, banks or actually more actual power to the people. I know that is an impossible question but it’s a provocation.

Howard Rheingold: Well you know I think people have various degrees of education where this Internet technology came from and where it’s going, to at granted it was originally created by the US defense department but the Internet was not really created or nor was it grown by the telephone companies or the computer companies of the world.

It was really created by millions of enthusiasts like you and I, who for the first time had access to what we call many-to-many technologies. It used to be said that freedom of the press is for those who can own a newspaper. For some years now anyone who has a desktop computer connected to the Internet and now, above of all connected to the Internet, they’ve got a printing press, a broadcasting station, a place where a community can have a marketplace, and you’re seeing whole new industries created in dormitory rooms.

It’s no longer the big incombent rich companies that create innovation but although they really work clueless because I know because I went in and interviewed the major telephone companies of the world in 1992 when the Internet was beginning to show on the horizon.

Not only were they clueless and contemptuous of making their tools available for millions of people, they are not clueless now, the incumbent content owners, the Disney of the world, the recording industry, the motion picture industry are reacting by extending copyright laws and by trying to … copyright laws into devices.

In the US we have the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which the US and other countries are trying to extend to the world, through the world of intellectual property organizations, which makes it very difficult for amateurs to make amateur production using these technologies because of the lock on ownership.

You have companies like Disney who can take folk tales like Snowhite, appropiate them from the public domain, stamp an ownership copyright on it and then sue anybody else who tries to use what they’ve stolen in the first place.

On the other hand we have companies that provide access to the Internet, the phone companies and the cable companies, trying to re-institute the centralized technical, economic and political control that they had before their centralized …. networks or democratized, net neutrality is the name for one of the ways that broadband providers are trying to make sure that you can’t start a competing business in your dormitory room.

In the future you’ll sort of have to be a technology geek and a policy-maker to understand that these conflicts are taking place, but I think, if you look at what the cable companies in the US are trying to do in terms of controlling what bits pass their parts of the network, that’s the net neutrality, if you look at what the authoritarian government of China is trying to do in making, I think that at last count was two hundred million in China with access to the Internet and they have everything that everybody else has: they got their social network, they got their instant messaging, they’ve got their video, a tremendous freedom to communicate just as long as you don’t criticize the government so I see…

And they’re trying to do it at the same level by controlling the routers, the machines that pass the bits, they want to have sensors in those routers for political expressions, just as Comcast in the US wants to put sensors in those routers to prevent competing bits to move over their network so I believe that the future is not necessarily going to be as the freewheeling and creative as it is now.

I think the good news is that millions of people have tasted freedom.

They can make videos and upload them to YouTube, they can start a mailgroup anytime they want. I think that having a population that’s tasted that freedom is going to be hard to put it back in the box when you got one phone company and three television channels and your only choice is which brand are you going to buy, not what are you going to create, what the millions of amateurs are going to pay attention to.

I think it’s important for people to understand that our freedom is not guaranteed in this … What we know and what we do is going to count in the next few years.

People’s Lobby

Robin Good: How we can best put to use what we know and what we can do to avoid seen a too a negative change in the media we love so much?

Howard Rheingold: Well, at least in theory, democratic governments are influenced by public opinion. Public opinion to an elected political office holder means potential votes. Right now, the people they listen to are the lobbyists for the big companies who are spending a lot of money trying to win politically what they have lost through decentralization of technology. Politicians are not going to listen to the amateurs, the millions of people who use the Internet without anybody’s permission about what they create.

But.

If we know what is at stake and we make known to our political leaders, if there is significant public opinion that we want to retain these freedoms, they have to listen to us, because they take those large sums of money from lobbyists so that they can get re-elected. But if they get the message from the voters that it doesn’t matter what you spend we are not going to re-elect you if you cut our freedoms off, I think that will have some effect.

I can’t speak about the situation in China but in countries where we have some degree of public opinion that can influence policy-makers. Let policy-makers know.

If you just go and search for the word net-neutrality you will find out about the battles that are going on.

If you search under Digital Millenium Copyright Act you will find out what that means.

There are organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation that are trying to organize. So it is not as if people are doing nothing.

We need more people who are aware of these issues and to join their names in the effort: people’s lobby.

Pervasive Technologies

Robin Good: When it comes to the pervasive Internet, this mobile net you have studied and followed so much, what are going to be the implications that we are going to see starting to appear, that we are not too aware of , that are coming against us at full speed and that you can anticipate to us. What is it going to be? Are there going to be sensors everywhere? Are we going to see machines inside social networks? What is going to happen?

Howard Rheingold: I think that the next thing that is going to happen is that most people on earth are going to have a telephone with Internet access. Actually this is already happening. We have already 300 million phones in China alone. So the largest growth for mobile phones in the future is precisely for those people who have not had access to technology and to the latest in media before. So we are seeing in higher nations like China and India bring in their significant people power and brain power.

This is why I think it is very important, given the global problems we have to solve about global warming and energy efficiency, environmental degradation, political conflict… we need all the minds that we can in on this. So I think it is very exciting…

Iqbal Quadir who started the Grameen Phone in Bangladesh, which makes telephones available through the microloans that have been made available by the Grameen Bank to a woman with no other income in a village in Bangladesh. That not only enables her to begin economic development for herself and for her family but it gives access to information, labor information to everybody in that village. Quadir believes that access to information and communication an essential part of development.

Sending money to people in the capital cities of developing countries just makes the problem worst.

What we need is to enable the people in the villages, the people who are moving from an agricultural way of life, who are streaming into cities, give them access to healthcare information, give them access to education.

One of the tremendous opportunities we have online, is that we have the world’s knowledge available, decreasing costs on devices, decreasing prices to more and more people…

Again I think that the critical uncertainty there is how are people going to know how to use the devices and the access to gain healthcare information, to get an education. This is why I think there are tremendous opportunities there and real challenges too.

The other side of this is that we are living in a surveilled society. It is so easy to put a camera up everywhere. It is so easy to tap into that data streams of individuals not only follow your phone calls but everywhere you go on the Internet.

Huge power not only for the states to have political control over citizens but for spammers, for people who simply want to sell you something. For your neighbour who may be angry at you. For your ex-spouse. For the person who you may have cut off in the traffic and got your license number.

This panoptic surveillance society is not just a big brother is big everybody. It is important to note that with these tremendous opportunities to expand freedoms and wealth we also have tremendous threats to our privacy and to our political liberty.

The technology alone is not going to guarantee an outcome one way or the other.

We have a period of time here when all these technologies have become suddenly available. We have gone from only a few very wealthy people having gigantic mobile phones to 3.5 billion tiny mobile phones in a little over ten years. That has never happened before. Took a lot longer for alphabetic literacy, the telephone, the printing press to spread.

Our institutions have not kept up with that. we are in a period where our institutions are trying to decide what to do: how to educate people; who is going to control these things; what freedoms do we have.

I think it is exciting, because I am a believer that if enough humans know what’s at stake they can influence the outcome. And there will be an outcome in ten or twenty years from now, you will know who controls these technologies and who does not have freedom and control.

Originally shot and recorded by Robin Good for Master New Media and Frontiers of Intercation IV and first published on July 2nd 2008 as “The Future And What It Holds: Howard Rheingold Interview - Frontiers Of Interaction IV”

I shot the video interview that follows for the Frontiers of Interaction conference which took place yesterday in Turin, Italy. Superbly organized by Leandro Agrò and Matteo Penzo, the sold out event brought together high prestige names like sci-fi writer and visionary Bruce Sterling, Elizabeth Churchill Principal Research Scientist di Yahoo, Jeffrey Schnapp, Nicolas Nova, Ashley Benigno as well as a selected cream of Italian visionaries and technologists (Luca Mascaro, Fabrizio Capobianco, David Orban and several more).

Frontiers-of-Interaction-Howard-Rheingold.jpg

The focus of my questions in this video interview with Howard Rheingold, was kindly suggested by the event organizer Leandro Agrò, and they focused on:

a) the future of technology,

b) the speed at which things change,

c) who will eventually control the Internet,

d) what we can do about it, and

e) how pervasive technology will become in the next few years.

The Frontiers of Interaction event was mostly in English with some Italian language sessions. You can watch good quality recordings of most of yesterday sessions on Dolmedia Frontiers of Interaction page.

Here’s the integral unedited Howard Rheingold video interview (18 mins) as well as the entire English text transcript.

Interview With Howard Rheingold

Frontiers of Interaction - Turin - July 1 2008

Full English Text Transcript

Intro

Robin Good: Hi everyone here is Robin Good from Rome, Italy and I’m connecting with Howard Rheingold just off San Francisco bay. Good morning Howard!

Howard Rheingold: Good morning.

RG: How are you doing today?

Howard Rheingold: Excellent, it’s a shiny, beautiful day, I’m alive, what more can you have?

Speed of Change

Robin Good: …nothing really. We’re here for the Frontiers of Interaction fourth edition that is taking place in Turin and we’re offering the audience there the opportunity to reach out to Howard who’s one of the pioneers of cooperation, collaboration and the evolution of the use of media technologies from computers to the more pervasive mobile technologies that we are using at most every corner now. So Howard has been following this evolution by living inside the evolution, by participating in communities online and by writing, studying and learning from others as much as he could so I’ve got a few question that I’ve stammed from the theme of the interaction event that is taking place in Turin, and the first one is just really to warm up, I don’t know what you’re going to answer to this but the question is:

How speed is really getting in this future? Is it getting ahead of us, is it difficult to keep up ace with it, I mean as we’re trying to understand all that it changes it keeps changing faster. What reflections you have on this?

Howard Rheingold: What’s changing fast is the technology and the access to all kind of new media. We witnessed the fact that we are speaking through our computers, with computer cameras, on video…that’s no big deal for a lot of people now. It was pretty miracolous maybe impossible, just a few years ago, it’s just a huge proliferation of ways to communicate, devices…I think the big good news is what has been called the digital device really has been attacked by … We have cheap powerful chips that, I think at last counter was between a three and a half billion and four billion mobile phones in the world and at least a hundred million of those are cameras. I think it’s pretty clear that five years from now, ten years from now most people in the world will be carrying a device that will not only enable to speak on the telephone but access the Internet, to download and probably to upload and to stream video.

So a lot of the dreams of yesteryear are now in people’s pockets. I think the bad news, if you want to look at it that way, is that there are so many different ways to communicate. You’ve got forums, you’ve got Google groups or Yahoo groups, you got several different ways of communicating with video, you’ve got blogs, wikis, we’ve got Twitter, we’ve got instant messaging, we’ve got chat. now I think the divide is one of literacy, the device is not so much between the haves and the have-nots, in terms of having access to technology, but between the knows and the know-hows and the don’t-know-hows.

What you know and how you know, how to participate, and the on-going culture that’s being created upon access to many to many media, that really makes the difference and I don’t see our educational institutions or our parents keeping up with the pass of change.

I think parents are afraid to talk to their children about making moral choices, thinking critically about what they see online because they fear … their children no more than they do about the technology. At the same time we see this moral panics about what is happening online.

Then I think it’s a result of the larger society and a lot of mass media that communicate with that society. Also lagging behind their understanding of the media that are becoming available.

Who Will Control The Internet In The Future>?

Robin Good: Thank you Howard, very interesting answer. You opened up quite a bit of space and interesting themes there, but let me ask you: as far as the pervasive presence of the Internet, I have here a provoking question. Do you that given the first alerts of net neutrality or the big changes that are taking place in the world economy…I mean who do you think is going to be possibly ruling next if the Internet becomes more pervasive? Telcos, banks or actually more actual power to the people. I know that is an impossible question but it’s a provocation.

Howard Rheingold: Well you know I think people have various degrees of education where this Internet technology came from and where it’s going, to at granted it was originally created by the US defense department but the Internet was not really created or nor was it grown by the telephone companies or the computer companies of the world.

It was really created by millions of enthusiasts like you and I, who for the first time had access to what we call many-to-many technologies. It used to be said that freedom of the press is for those who can own a newspaper. For some years now anyone who has a desktop computer connected to the Internet and now, above of all connected to the Internet, they’ve got a printing press, a broadcasting station, a place where a community can have a marketplace, and you’re seeing whole new industries created in dormitory rooms.

It’s no longer the big incombent rich companies that create innovation but although they really work clueless because I know because I went in and interviewed the major telephone companies of the world in 1992 when the Internet was beginning to show on the horizon.

Not only were they clueless and contemptuous of making their tools available for millions of people, they are not clueless now, the incumbent content owners, the Disney of the world, the recording industry, the motion picture industry are reacting by extending copyright laws and by trying to … copyright laws into devices.

In the US we have the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which the US and other countries are trying to extend to the world, through the world of intellectual property organizations, which makes it very difficult for amateurs to make amateur production using these technologies because of the lock on ownership.

You have companies like Disney who can take folk tales like Snowhite, appropiate them from the public domain, stamp an ownership copyright on it and then sue anybody else who tries to use what they’ve stolen in the first place.

On the other hand we have companies that provide access to the Internet, the phone companies and the cable companies, trying to re-institute the centralized technical, economic and political control that they had before their centralized …. networks or democratized, net neutrality is the name for one of the ways that broadband providers are trying to make sure that you can’t start a competing business in your dormitory room.

In the future you’ll sort of have to be a technology geek and a policy-maker to understand that these conflicts are taking place, but I think, if you look at what the cable companies in the US are trying to do in terms of controlling what bits pass their parts of the network, that’s the net neutrality, if you look at what the authoritarian government of China is trying to do in making, I think that at last count was two hundred million in China with access to the Internet and they have everything that everybody else has: they got their social network, they got their instant messaging, they’ve got their video, a tremendous freedom to communicate just as long as you don’t criticize the government so I see…

And they’re trying to do it at the same level by controlling the routers, the machines that pass the bits, they want to have sensors in those routers for political expressions, just as Comcast in the US wants to put sensors in those routers to prevent competing bits to move over their network so I believe that the future is not necessarily going to be as the freewheeling and creative as it is now.

I think the good news is that millions of people have tasted freedom.

They can make videos and upload them to YouTube, they can start a mailgroup anytime they want. I think that having a population that’s tasted that freedom is going to be hard to put it back in the box when you got one phone company and three television channels and your only choice is which brand are you going to buy, not what are you going to create, what the millions of amateurs are going to pay attention to.

I think it’s important for people to understand that our freedom is not guaranteed in this … What we know and what we do is going to count in the next few years.

People’s Lobby

Robin Good: How we can best put to use what we know and what we can do to avoid seen a too a negative change in the media we love so much?

Howard Rheingold: Well, at least in theory, democratic governments are influenced by public opinion. Public opinion to an elected political office holder means potential votes. Right now, the people they listen to are the lobbyists for the big companies who are spending a lot of money trying to win politically what they have lost through decentralization of technology. Politicians are not going to listen to the amateurs, the millions of people who use the Internet without anybody’s permission about what they create.

But.

If we know what is at stake and we make known to our political leaders, if there is significant public opinion that we want to retain these freedoms, they have to listen to us, because they take those large sums of money from lobbyists so that they can get re-elected. But if they get the message from the voters that it doesn’t matter what you spend we are not going to re-elect you if you cut our freedoms off, I think that will have some effect.

I can’t speak about the situation in China but in countries where we have some degree of public opinion that can influence policy-makers. Let policy-makers know.

If you just go and search for the word net-neutrality you will find out about the battles that are going on.

If you search under Digital Millenium Copyright Act you will find out what that means.

There are organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation that are trying to organize. So it is not as if people are doing nothing.

We need more people who are aware of these issues and to join their names in the effort: people’s lobby.

Pervasive Technologies

Robin Good: When it comes to the pervasive Internet, this mobile net you have studied and followed so much, what are going to be the implications that we are going to see starting to appear, that we are not too aware of , that are coming against us at full speed and that you can anticipate to us. What is it going to be? Are there going to be sensors everywhere? Are we going to see machines inside social networks? What is going to happen?

Howard Rheingold: I think that the next thing that is going to happen is that most people on earth are going to have a telephone with Internet access. Actually this is already happening. We have already 300 million phones in China alone. So the largest growth for mobile phones in the future is precisely for those people who have not had access to technology and to the latest in media before. So we are seeing in higher nations like China and India bring in their significant people power and brain power.

This is why I think it is very important, given the global problems we have to solve about global warming and energy efficiency, environmental degradation, political conflict… we need all the minds that we can in on this. So I think it is very exciting…

Iqbal Quadir who started the Grameen Phone in Bangladesh, which makes telephones available through the microloans that have been made available by the Grameen Bank to a woman with no other income in a village in Bangladesh. That not only enables her to begin economic development for herself and for her family but it gives access to information, labor information to everybody in that village. Quadir believes that access to information and communication an essential part of development.

Sending money to people in the capital cities of developing countries just makes the problem worst.

What we need is to enable the people in the villages, the people who are moving from an agricultural way of life, who are streaming into cities, give them access to healthcare information, give them access to education.

One of the tremendous opportunities we have online, is that we have the world’s knowledge available, decreasing costs on devices, decreasing prices to more and more people…

Again I think that the critical uncertainty there is how are people going to know how to use the devices and the access to gain healthcare information, to get an education. This is why I think there are tremendous opportunities there and real challenges too.

The other side of this is that we are living in a surveilled society. It is so easy to put a camera up everywhere. It is so easy to tap into that data streams of individuals not only follow your phone calls but everywhere you go on the Internet.

Huge power not only for the states to have political control over citizens but for spammers, for people who simply want to sell you something. For your neighbour who may be angry at you. For your ex-spouse. For the person who you may have cut off in the traffic and got your license number.

This panoptic surveillance society is not just a big brother is big everybody. It is important to note that with these tremendous opportunities to expand freedoms and wealth we also have tremendous threats to our privacy and to our political liberty.

The technology alone is not going to guarantee an outcome one way or the other.

We have a period of time here when all these technologies have become suddenly available. We have gone from only a few very wealthy people having gigantic mobile phones to 3.5 billion tiny mobile phones in a little over ten years. That has never happened before. Took a lot longer for alphabetic literacy, the telephone, the printing press to spread.

Our institutions have not kept up with that. we are in a period where our institutions are trying to decide what to do: how to educate people; who is going to control these things; what freedoms do we have.

I think it is exciting, because I am a believer that if enough humans know what’s at stake they can influence the outcome. And there will be an outcome in ten or twenty years from now, you will know who controls these technologies and who does not have freedom and control.

Originally shot and recorded by Robin Good for Master New Media and Frontiers of Intercation IV and first published on July 2nd 2008 as “The Future And What It Holds: Howard Rheingold Interview - Frontiers Of Interaction IV”

Bypassing internet filters, circumventing internet censorship blocks, sidestepping forced filtering by commercial internet filtering software are the key focus topics of this depth-guide to internet circumvention issues, tools and technologies.

internet-censorship-and-filtering-mashup-by-Robin-Good-485.jpg
Photo-motage by Robin Good with images by: Erik Isselée (rat), Doug Steven (censored sign), Marc Dietrich (scissors)

Whether you are connecting to the Internet from a country that enforces internet filters of some kind or are trying to sidestep pre-installed software on the computer you are using which prevents you from accessing existing public content on the Internet, the advice and information collected in this guide is going to provide a solid starting point to get yourself more informed and better equipped to bypass this different forms of internet censorship and filtering.

Thanks to the work of Ron Deibert, Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto, what you have here is a guide for the layman that explains in simple terms all you need to know to bypass Internet censorship, filtering systems. His OpenNet Initiative project, of which he is a co-founder and principal investigator is a research and advocacy project that examines Internet censorship and surveillance worldwide. he is also involved in the CiviSec Project, which develops information security tools and strategies for human rights and humanitarian organizations worldwide, and is the principal investigator of the psiphon censorship circumvention project. and surveillance worldwide, the CiviSec Project,

Here is all you need to know about Internet circumvention technologies:

Intro by Robin Good
white-rat_id1944161_size110.jpg

Examples From Real World

1) Peter Yuan

At 11:15 am on February 8, 2006, unknown assailants forcibly entered Peter Yuan Li’s Atlanta, GA (USA) home, bound and beat him, and then left with several laptops and other files belonging to him. An information technology specialist from Princeton University and a Falun Gong practitioner, Peter Yuan Li had been maintaining several forums in the United States where users within China could tunnel through China’s national firewalls to read and post information on the banned religious movement. Although there is no conclusive evidence to prove the case, Mr. Li believes that the assailants were operatives of the Chinese government trying to shut down his service.

2) WSIS In Tunisia

The World Summit on Information Society II (WSIS) was held in Tunis, Tunisia in 2006. Tunisia filters access to content extensively, including web sites critical of the government’s human rights record.

WSIS was held in a building that had two sections, each with different Internet access protocols. In the official proceedings’ section, Internet access was unfettered. In a separate section reserved for NGOs and journalists, Internet access was managed through a Tunisian ISP, which filtered content heavily using the American commercial product, Smartfilter.

An NGO with a booth located on the filtered side set up a proxy with an SSH-D tunnel to their home office computer, based in the Netherlands. The NGO then informed members of the port number of the browser, allowing them to bypass Tunisian filtering.

Everyone’s Guide to By-Passing Internet Censorship for Citizens Worldwide

by The Citizen Lab

Internet-censorship-Cover-report-400.jpg

Glossary

Circumvention Technologies are any tools, software, or methods used to bypass Internet filtering. These can range from complex computer programs to relatively simple manual steps, such as accessing a banned website stored on a search engine’s cache, instead of trying to access it directly.

Circumvention Providers install software on a computer in a non-filtered location and make connections to this computer available to those who access the Internet from a censored location. Circumvention providers can range from large commercial organizations offering circumvention services for a fee to individuals providing circumvention services for free.

Circumvention Users users are individuals who use circumvention technologies to bypass Internet content filtering.

Introduction

Internet censorship, or content filtering, has become a major global problem. Whereas once it was assumed that states could not control Internet communications, according to research by the OpenNet Initiative more than 25 countries now engage in Internet censorship practices. Those with the most pervasive filtering policies have been found to routinely block access to human rights organizations, news, blogs, and web services that challenge the status quo or are deemed threatening or undesirable. Others block access to single categories of Internet content, or intermittently to specific websites or network services to coincide with strategic events, such as elections or public demonstrations.

Although some states enact Internet filtering legislation, most do so with little or no transparency and public accountability. Most states do not reveal what information is being blocked, and rarely are there review or grievance mechanisms for affected citizens or content publishers. Compounding the problem is the increasing use of commercial filtering software, which is prone to over-blocking due to faulty categorization.

Commercial filters block access to categorized lists of websites that are kept secret for proprietary reasons, even for customers. As a consequence, unaccountable private companies determine censorship rules in political environments where there is little public accountability or oversight. For example, commercial filtering software is used to censor the Internet in Burma, Tunisia, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.

This guide is meant to introduce non-technical users to Internet censorship circumvention technologies, and help them choose which of them best suits their circumstances and needs.

Examples from the real world

china_200.jpg

In China, the government controls access to Internet content and online publishing by a combination of technical filtering methods and extensive regulations and guidelines. The technical filtering is implemented primarily at the national backbone level, with requests for information filtered for both banned Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and keywords.

Although sometimes inconsistent, China’s centralized system of content filtering ensures uniform blocking of access throughout the country to human rights, opposition political movements, Taiwanese and Tibetan independence, international news, and other web sites. There is very little transparency about Internet filtering, and no public accountability process.

iran_200.jpg

Internet content filtering practices vary widely by country. In Iran, there is no nationwide uniform fi ltering system. Instead, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are responsible for implementing censorship following explicit guidelines stipulated by the state.

Individual ISPs choose how they filter, with some using American commercial filtering software while others use more manual methods. Users accessing the Internet on different ISPs can experience significant variation of accessibility to web sites. Iran uses this system to filter Iran-related and Persian/Farsi language content critical of the regime, including politically sensitive sites, gay and lesbian content, women’s rights sites, streaming media, and blogs.

While there are debates within government that openly acknowledge and discuss Internet content filtering policies, there is very little transparency about the specific content that is targeted for filtering.

usa_200.jpg

In the United States, public institutions (e.g., schools and libraries) are required by law (the Children’s Internet Protection Act - CIPA) to use filtering software to block access to obscene, pornographic and other materials related to the sexual exploitation of children.

Most implement the filtering policy by using commercial filtering technologies, which are prone to miscategorization and error. Researchers have found that commercial filtering technologies mistakenly block access to content related to women’s health, gay and lesbian rights groups, and sexual education for teenagers.

1) Where Is A Problem > There Is A Solution

where-there-is-a-problem-there-is-a-solution-380.jpg

In the face of this growing global problem, citizens around the world have sought solutions to evade government filters and exercise their basic human rights to access information of their own choosing.

The tools, methods, and strategies that are used to by-pass Internet content filtering are referred to as circumvention technologies. There are numerous circumvention technologies that can be used under a variety of different circumstances by a wide range of potential users. No one technology fits all of the different potential users and the circumstances within which they find themselves. Our view is that it is much better to think of circumvention technologies pragmatically as tools in a toolkit. Just as some tools are better for some jobs and not others, or require different levels of skill to employ responsibly, each circumvention technology should be approached in terms of how best it fits each user’s unique problems, circumstances, and skillset.

Circumvention technologies often target different types of users with varying resources and levels of expertise. What may work well in one scenario may not be the best option in another. When choosing a circumvention technology, it is important for the potential circumvention provider and user to determine what works best for their situation.

The decision to use circumvention technology should be taken seriously, carefully analyzing the specific needs, available resources, and security concerns of everyone involved. There is a wide variety of technologies available for users who want to circumvent Internet filtering. However, using them for successful and stable circumvention service depends on a variety of factors, including the user’s level of technical skill, potential security risk, and contacts available outside the censored jurisdiction. We outline some general considerations in choosing circumvention technologies for potential users and then for providers.

2) Choosing Circumvention - Considerations For The Circumvention User

choosing-circumvention-350.jpg

a) What, Where, How

Do you want to access or publish information on the Internet?

Although closely related, accessing banned content, as opposed to publishing it, can involve different risks, strategies and technologies for the user. We have created a separate guide for those who want to circumvent Internet censorship to publish information online.

Are you accessing the Internet from a private or public computer?

Accessing the Internet from either your home or a public computer at an Internet cafe or public library involves a different set of considerations, and presents a range of possibilities for circumvention. For example, users who access the Internet from public computers or Internet
cafés may not be able to install any software and will be restricted to web-based solutions.

Others may want to use applications besides Web browsing (HTTP), such as e-mail (SMTP) and file transfers (FTP), and thus may want to install software on their computer workstation and to 6tweak their computer’s settings. With your own private computer, you can install any software of your own choosing that you may not be able to install on a public Internet terminal. However doing so can impose additional risks, as there is now evidence on your computer of the use of circumvention technologies which, if seized by authorities, could lead to liabilities.

Public Internet access can offer anonymity that private computers cannot, although some require visitors to present personal identification and/or monitor visitors’ usage. Whether you circumvent censorship through your home or a public terminal, it is always important to understand as fully as possible the terms and conditions of the service that is being provided.

b) Who Do You Know?

Do you have any connections to or availability of trusted out-of-country contacts (e.g., friends, family members, colleagues)?

Since circumventing Internet censorship involves making connections to a computer outside of the
jurisdiction in which the censorship takes place, an important factor for consideration is whether you know and trust someone or group outside of the country who is willing to provide circumvention services for you. Many users who circumvent censorship do so by connecting to open public proxy computers whose connection information is advertised in some manner.

Users should be aware that these are the least secure by definition, since a user can never be certain that an adversary has not set up a trap, or “honey pot”, to entice dissidents. Having someone you know and trust set up a connection instead is a better option, but it is not without its own set of risks and considerations. Providers can monitor everything you do online, including all of the sites you visit. That is why it is essential that you fully trust the person or organization that is providing the circumvention service for you. Successful, long-term and stable circumvention is greatly enhanced by having a trusted contact in a non-filtered location.

Are you willing to pay and put your trust into a third party organization to access or publish information on the Internet?

If you do not have access to trusted friends and family members outside of your jurisdiction then you may have to put your trust into a third party. There are many commercial providers that offer circumvention services for a fee. If you are able to afford this option, be careful to explore the terms and conditions of the service and the privacy policy. Commercial services may offer anonymity to surf the Internet, but not anonymity from the commercial provider itself. If compelled by law, the commercial service may turn over all of their records, and your personal information.

c) What Do You Know?

What is your level of technical expertise? Do you consider yourself a beginner, intermediate, or expert computer user?

The greater your level of technical expertise the more your circumvention options increase. Some users may find the installation, set-up process, and use of circumvention technologies to be too onerous or beyond their level of expertise. Although it is always possible to invest time and learn how to use even the most seemingly complex software, be careful: the incorrect installation and use of circumvention technologies may put you at considerable risk.

What language of use is acceptable/preferable to you? Do you require technologies that operate other than English?

Most circumvention technologies are designed with user interfaces and instructions in English, although many also offer versions of their systems and user guides in other languages. If you are consulting a translated user’s manual, be sure that the translations you use match the version of the software you are employing as the two may not necessarily match.

d) Safety & Security

Are you accessing content that is highly critical of and is considered a security threat to the country in which you live?

Is there a precedent for arrests for the practice of circumventing Internet censorship in your country?

Do you have any affiliations with high profile groups that are known to be on your government’s watch list?

Accessing banned content can be a serious violation of the law, especially if the information you are visiting is considered a national security threat. If you are consistently accessing this type of content, you should choose circumvention technologies that offer the greatest anonymity and security. However, there is usually a trade-off between ease-of-use and security so be prepared to spend extra time and effort in order to minimize risks.

If you are associated with a high profile rights organization or dissident group, then you may be on
your government’s watch list and you should take extra precautions in carefully choosing your circumvention technologies. You may want to assume that you are being monitored and that your computer could be seized at any time. Avoid circumvention technologies that require installation on your computer. If possible, access the Internet from a range of different anonymous public terminals instead.

e) Identity

Is protecting your identity online of paramount importance to you?

Do you want to surf and/or publish anonymously?

Circumvention and anonymity are different. Anonymous systems protect your identity from the website you are connecting to and from the anonymity system itself. They can be used for circumvention, but are not designed for this purpose and thus can easily be blocked. Circumvention systems are designed to get around blocking but do not protect your identity from the circumvention provider.

Do not mistake open public proxies for anonymous systems - they are not. Although they may not ask for personal information, they can view and record the location of the computer from which you are connecting and all of the websites you visit through them. Commercial services which advertize anonymous surfing may still record your connection information and the web sites you visit. Make sure you fully understand the terms and conditions of their use.

There are a number of strategies that you can follow if you want to publish online anonymously. The Citizen Lab has created a separate guide on circumvention for publishing online that includes a section on anonymous publishing.

3) Choosing Circumvention - Consideration For The Circumvention Provider

a) Safety First

Setting up a circumvention technology for someone is a great way to give a helping hand to others to exercise their basic human rights of access to information and freedom of speech. However, it is a choice that carries with it a heavy responsibility and several considerations. Above all else, the safety of your users must be your primary concern.

What is your level of technical expertise?

Do you consider yourself a beginner, intermediate, or expert computer user?

Setting up and hosting a circumvention technology server can be a time-consuming and complex task depending on the circumvention system. Some require the download and installation of several different pieces of software. Almost all of them will entail some configuration to accommodate your own particular network environment. If you are running your Internet connection through a home router or firewall, for example, there may be some customization of your circumvention system.

Some circumvention technologies have very clear and helpful documentation and user guides while others do not. Be sure that you choose a technology that matches your skill level and abilities, as setting up a system improperly could jeopardize the security of your user(s). Make sure that you are also comfortable maintaining your system, as an outdated or constantly interrupted technology can frustrate and needlessly endanger users in censored locations.

b) Your Users

What is the number of users you expect or want to accommodate and what is your available bandwidth?

The number of users you allow to surf through your computer will affect your computer’s processing capabilities and your connection speeds, affecting not only what you do but what circumvention users can do. The more users you have, the more complicated it will be to monitor their usage (if necessary) and manage their accounts. Make sure that you offer circumvention services only to the number of users you and your computer can comfortably handle.

What will you allow your users to do through your connection?

Would you want to know what information they are accessing or publishing?

What are you going to do with their surfing records?

Setting up a circumvention service means that you will be able to monitor all of the usage that runs through it. Having this capability means that you can decide what information you will allow users to retrieve or publish. Some circumvention systems make this feature easier to employ than others, but even those that do not still leave traces on your computer of the user’s activity.

You must decide for yourself what information you will choose to view, archive, and/or discard. If you choose to discard this information, make sure that you do it properly as even deleted information can leave traces. Above all, make sure that you let your users know what your standard operating procedure will be concerning the information they leave on your computer and what they can do through your circumvention system. Communicate a clear policy to your users.

c) Risks

What are your potential security and legal risks of hosting circumvention technologies?

Does your ISP or government restrict this type of service?

The risks of hosting circumvention technologies are not as great as they are for users of circumvention technologies, but they are not zero. You are almost certainly responsible for everything that is done through your computer using your Internet connection. If someone visits websites or posts information through your circumvention service that is illegal you may be held liable. A less likely but nonetheless significant risk concerns the possibility of you becoming a target of foreign agents of the country in which your service is offered. Make sure that you understand the potential security and legal risks of hosting circumvention technologies from the perspective of both your ISP and your own government.

4) Technology

Internet-censorship-technology-425.gif

a) Web-Based Circumvention Systems

Web-based circumvention systems are special web pages that allow users to submit a URL and have the web-based circumventor retrieve the requested web page. There is no connection between the user and the requested website as the circumventor transparently proxies the request allowing the user to browse blocked websites seamlessly.

Since the web addresses of public circumventors are widely known, most Internet filtering applications already have these services on their block lists, as do many countries that filter at the national level. Web-based circumvention systems could be a good choice for the users connecting with no trusted out of country contacts, assuming the pages are not yet blocked.

NOTE: Although some may advertise themselves as “anonymous” many web-based circumvention are not. Some may not even be encrypted. It is important to remember that encrypted websites begin with “https” and are signified by the open lock icon in your web browser moving to the locked position. If you send your web requests unencrypted, they can be easily intercepted any step along the way of transmission, from your home or office router to your ISP.


Proxify-90.gif

stupid-censorship-220.gif

Proxify and Stupid Censorship are encrypted, public, web-based circumvention systems. A user in a censored country simply visits one of the web sites and then inputs their destination. Since these web services are public, however, they are blocked in many countries and by most filtering applications.

Proxify And StupidCensorship
Links: https://proxify.com/ - http://stupidcensorship.com/

CGI-Proxy-150.gif

CGIProxy is the engine that most web-based circumvention systems use. Private web-based circumvention systems turn a computer into a personal, encrypted server capable of retrieving and displaying web pages to users of the server connecting remotely.

Private web-based circumventors include providers, who install and run circumvention software in an uncensored jurisdiction, and users, who access the service from a jurisdiction that censors the Internet. The circumvention provider grows his/her private network based on social relations of trust and private communications making it difficult for censors to find and block.

CGIProxy
Links: http://www.jmarshall.com/

psiphon-logo-120.jpg

psiphon turns a regular home computer into a personal, encrypted server capable of retrieving and displaying web pages anywhere. The user in the uncensored country downloads the software and installs it on his/her home computer. psiphon is free and open source, and comes in Linux and Windows versions. It is easy to install, and comes with a very detailed and easy-to-follow user guide. If your computer is behind a home router it may require some configuration.

Once installed, the psiphon provider sends the connection information to users in censored jurisdictions by the most secure means available. The censored user does not have to install any software but simply types a URL into the psiphon “blue bar.” This means that the psiphon circumvention system can be accessed from anywhere. Since the locations of psiphon-enabled computers are private, they are difficult for censors to find and block.

psiphon
Links: http://psiphon.civisec.org/

Peacefire-70.gif

Peacefire/Circumventor is a circumvention system nearly identical in principle and method to psiphon. However, It can be difficult to install. Three different software packages must be downloaded and installed, and if your computer is behind a home router it may require additional configuration. Although Peacefire/Circumventor provides some setup help, there is not a detailed user guide as there is with psiphon. Otherwise, Peacefire/Circumventor works along the same principles as psiphon.

Peacefire/Circumventor
Links: http://peacefire.org/

b) Tunneling Software

Tunneling encapsulates one form of traffic inside of other forms of traffic. Typically, insecure, unencrypted traffic is tunneled within an encrypted connection. The normal services on the user’s computer are available, but run through the tunnel to the non-filtered computer which forwards the user’s requests and their responses transparently.

Users with contacts in a non-filtered country can set up private tunneling services while those without contacts can purchase commercial tunneling services. “Web” tunneling software restricts the tunneling to web traffic so that web browsers will function but not other applications. “Application” tunneling software allows one to tunnel multiple Internet applications, such as email clients and instant messengers.

b.1) Web Tunneling Software

ultrareach-logo-145.gif

UltraReach has created anti-censorship software known as UltraSurf. UltraReach provides a client download for Windows that the user in the censored country downloads (installation is not required) on his or her own computer. It is free software and is available in English and Chinese. Once started, the application opens an Internet Explorer application that is automatically configured to allow the user to browse web sites through UltraSurf. Other browsers must be manually configured. By default, the connection is encrypted and various techniques are used to find an unblocked IP address.

UltraSurf is an excellent choice for non-technical users who are willing to trust a third-party and require free web browsing at reasonable speeds. Since the UltraReach website is often already blocked in some countries, a user in a censored jurisdiction may have to acquire the software through a third party. Even though the site may be blocked, the service could still be accessible as measures are taken to acquire unblocked IP addresses in a variety of ways. However, even these
could be blocked by a very determined censor.

UltraReach
Link: http://www.ultrareach.com/
Price: Free

freegate_130.gif

Freegate is an anti-censorship technology developed by DynaWeb, similar in many ways to UltraSurf. Unlike UltraSurf, however, Freegate does not encrypt the URL by default. If users want to encrypt the URL request, they have to download another software package and specially configure Freegate.

FreeGate is a good choice for expert users who are more concerned with circumvention than security, are willing to trust a third party, do some manual configuration, and require free web browsing at reasonable speeds.

As with UltraSurf, the Freegate website is blocked in many censored jursidictions, and so users must acquire the software through a third party. Likewise, the service itself may be blocked, although users can manually insert unblocked IP addresses into Freegate.

FreeGate
Link: http://www.dit-inc.us
Price: Free

anonymizer-logo-120.jpg

Anonymizer provides a client download for Windows that a user in a censored country installs on their computer. After completing the easy installation process, the user enables the “Anonymous Surfing ™” option after which their traffic is transparently tunneled through Anonymizer.
However, to ensure security the user must enable the “Surfing Security ™ SSL Encryption” so that all traffic is encrypted with HTTPS/SSL. This option is disabled by default. The software also provides other services, such as “Digital Shredder”, Anti-Spyware, and disposable email addresses.

Anonymizer is an excellent choice for users that are not technically proficient and are willing to pay and trust a third party for encrypted web browsing at high speeds. Since the Anonymizer website is often blocked in many jurisdictions, a user may have to acquire the software through a third party.
While the service may still be accessible in spite of the filtering of the web site, the service itself could be easily blocked by a determined censor. Since the application must be installed, it may not be suitable for public terminals or high-risk users whose computers are at risk of being seized.

Anonymizer
Link: http://anonymizer.com
Price: Pay

ghost-surf-110.gif

GhostSurf provides a client download for Windows that a user in a censored country installs on their computer. After completing the installation, the software configures the Internet Explorer browser automatically. All other browsers must be manually configured.

The software is set to “Normal” by default, meaning all traffic is in plain text and easily intercepted. To encrypt the traffic, the user must change this setting to “Secure,” the highest setting (the “Anonymous” setting is misleading, only blocking cookies, not making traffic anonymous). Once the software is configured with the “Secure” setting, and the user has modified the browser settings if not using Internet Explorer, the user’s traffic is encrypted and is routed through Ghost Surf servers.

Ghost Surf is a good choice for those who are somewhat technically proficient and are willing to pay and trust a third party for a fast connection. As with Anonymzer, since the Ghost Surf website is often blocked in many jurisdictions, a user may have to acquire the software through a third party. While the service may still be accessible in spite of the filtering of the website, the service itself could be easily blocked by a determined censor. Since the application must be installed, it may not be suitable for public terminals or high-risk users whose computers are at risk of being seized.

Ghost Surf
Link: http://tenebril.com
Price: Pay

b.2) Application Tunneling Software

Gpass-logo-90.gif

GPass provides a client download for Windows that a user in a censored jurisdiction downloads (there is an optional installer) on their computer. It is free software and is available in English and Chinese. Once GPass is started, the icons of applications to be proxied through Gpass can be dragged and dropped into the Gpass interface. When these application are started via Gpass, they are automatically configured to run through the service. By default, Internet Explorer, Windows Media Player, and the default email client are already configured. By default, the connection is encrypted and various techniques are used to find and connect to an unblocked IP address. The application provides reasonable speeds and has the ability to store encrypted bookmarks and other files.

GPass is an excellent choice for non-technical users who are willing to trust a third party and require encrypted, free tunneling for services other than browsing (http) at reasonable speeds. As with Anonymizer and others, since the Gpass website is often already blocked in many jurisdictions and by filtering applications, a user may have to acquire the software through a third party. To counteract the possible filtering of the service, measures are taken to automatically find unblocked IP addresses. Since the application must be installed, it may not be suitable for public terminals or high-risk users whose computers are at risk of being seized.

GPass
Link: http://gpass1.com/
Price: Free

http-tunnel-logo-100.gif

HTTP Tunnel is another client download for Windows that a user in the censored country downloads and installs on their computer. Much like psiphon and Peacefire/ Circumventor, HTTP Tunnel also provides a “server” that a user in an uncensored country can download to setup a private service for someone in a censored country.

The HTTP Tunnel can be used for free although a pay service is also available. Users must manually configure applications, such as web browsers, email clients, and instant messengers to use HTTP Tunnel.

HTTP Tunnel is a good choice for technical users who are more concerned with circumvention than security and are willing to trust a third party, do some manual configuration and require tunneling for services other than browsing (http) at reasonable speeds. HTTP tunnel traffic does not appear to be not encrypted, just encoded. The latter is simply a different way of expressing information, not a way to keep information secret, as the former.

As with many others, since the HTTP Tunnel website is often already blocked in many jurisdictions and by filtering applications, a user may have to acquire the software through a third party. A determined censor could also block the service of HTTP Tunnel, although measures could be taken to counter-act such censoring by a technically proficient user. Since the application must be installed, it may not be suitable for public terminals or high-risk users whose computers are at risk of being seized.

HTTP Tunnel
Link: http://www.http-tunnel.com/
Price: Free

Relakks-logo-100.gif

Relakks provides a pay-service called Relakks Safe Surf. It is a Virtual Private Network (VPN) system that uses an encrypted tunnel to transport traffic from the user in the censored country through the Relakks servers. It uses the native VPN clients on the Windows and Mac platforms, so users are not required to install any software. Many different applications can be tunneled over the VPN, such as email, web browsing, and instant messaging.

Relakks Safe Surf is an good choice for those users who are not technically proficient and are willing to pay and trust a third party for a encrypted VPN. However, Relakks could be easily blocked.

Relakks
Link: https://www.relakks.com/
Price: Pay

Guardster-logo-100.gif

In addition to a free, non-encrypted, web-based circumvention system, Guardster provides both an encrypted web-based circumvention system and a Secure Shell (SSH) Tunnel for a fee. A variety of software applications, including web browsers and email clients, can be tunneled through the encrypted SSH tunnel of Guardster.

Guardster/SSH is a good choice for those users who are not technically proficient and are willing to pay and trust a third party for a encrypted tunnel. As with many others, since the Guardster/SSH website is often already blocked in many jurisdictions and by filtering applications, a user may have to acquire the software through a third party. A determined censor could also block the service of Guardster/SSH.

Guardster/SSH
Link: http://www.guardster.com/
Price: Pay

e) Anonymous Communication Systems

Anonymous technologies conceal a user’s IP address from the server hosting the web site visited by the user. Some, but not all, anonymous technologies conceal the user’s IP address from the anonymizing service itself and encrypt the traffic between the user and the service. Since users of anonymous technologies make requests for web content through a proxy service, instead of to the server hosting the content directly, anonymous technologies can be a useful way to bypass Internet censorship. However, some anonymous technologies require users to download software and can be easily blocked by authorities.

JAP-logo-150.jpg

JAP ANON provides a client download for Windows/Mac/Linux that the user in a censored country downloads and installs on their computer. It is available in English and several European languages. The user must select a “mix” through which to route traffic and then follow the instructions provided to configure the web browser to use JAP ANON. The “mix” is a set of intermediaries through which a request is routed and since many requests are moving through the mix neither the operators of the mix nor the host being requested through the mix know the user’s true identity.

However, there are varying levels of anonymity as some use a “single mix” while others use “mix cascades.” There is also a pay service for access to higher speeds and more anonymous mixes. JAP ANON is a good choice for technical users who require anonymity along with circumvention service for web browsing at reasonable speeds.

Since the JAP ANON website is often already blocked in many countries a user in a censored country may have to acquire the software through a third party. The service may still be accessible if the web site is blocked, although a determined censor could also block the service. Since the application must be installed it may not be suitable for public terminals or high risk users whose equipment may be seized.

JAP ANON
Link: http://anon.inf.tu-dresden.de/index_en.html
Price: Free

Tor-70.gif

For is a free, anonymous communications system that works by routing web requests through a series of routers each of which peels away a layer of encryption so that no individual router on the network can identify the source or the destination of the request. It is an excellent choice for those who require strong anonymity because it would be extremely difficult for a government to monitor your communications through the Tor network.

Tor also allows users to tunnel a variety of other protocols through its network, such as instant messaging traffic and email. It also has a feature known as “hidden services” that allows users to anonymously publish their own web pages that are only accessible via Tor. It presently requires a client download, so is likely not appropriate for public terminals and implies a significant risk for those whose computers may be seized. It is available in multiple languages and is open source, and has a very dedicated, thriving development network and documentation.

After installation, the Tor service begins and the user may use the preferred Firefox browser, which comes with “Torbutton” so Tor can be easily toggled on and off. Other browsers require manual configuration. Tor is an excellent choice for technical users who require strong anonymity along with circumvention service for multiple applications at slow speeds. Even though the Tor website is blocked in some countries, the service is not.

However, a determined government could easily block Tor if they choose to do so. However, developers are working on blocking resistance solutions. Because of the multiple routers through which Tor traffic passes, surfing the Internet via Tor can be slow.

Tor requires considerable computer skills; and is not for the novice.

TOR
Link: http://tor.eff.org/
Price: Free

i2p-logo.gif

I2P is an anonymization network that is primarily intended for users to publish content anonymously and access content anonymously through I2P. However, it can also be used to surf the Internet anonymously.

I2P provides a client download for Windows/Mac/Linux that a user in a censored country downloads and installs on their computer. The user’s browser must be manually configured to point through the I2P network. I2P is a good choice for technical users who require anonymity, primarily for publishing but also for circumventing filters at slow speeds.

Since the I2P website is often already blocked in many countries a user in a censored country may have to acquire the software through a third party. The service may still be accessible although it too could be blocked by a determined censor. Since the application must be installed it may not be suitable for public terminals or for high risk users whose computers may be seized.

I2P
Link: http://www.i2p.net
Price: Free

Tricks Of The Trade

tricks-of-the-trade-internet-censorship-380.gif

  • “Cached” Pages
    Many search engine provide copies of web pages, known as cached pages, of the original pages they index. When searching for a web site, look for a small link labeled “cached” next to your search results. Since you are retrieving a copy of the blocked page from the search engine’s servers, and not from the blocked web site itself, you may be able to access the censored content. However, some countries have targetted caching services for blocking.
    Example: Google Cache
  • Translation Services
    There are many translation services available on the Internet, often provided by search engines. If you access a we site through the translation service, it is the translation service that is accessing the blocked site. This allows you to read the censored content without directly connecting to the blocked website.
    Example: babel.altavista.com
  • RSS Aggregators
    RSS Aggregator are web sites that allow you to bookmark and read your favorite RSS feeds. RSS Aggregator sites will connect to the blocked we sites and download the the RSS feed and make it available to you. Since it is the aggregator connecting to the site, not you, you will be able to access the censored content.
    Example: www.bloglines.com
  • Alternate Domain Names
    One of the most common ways to censor a website is to block access to its domain name, e.g. news.bbc.co.uk. However, sites are often accessible at other domain names such as newsrss. bbc.co.uk. Therefore if one domain name is blocked try to see if the content can be
    accessed at another domain.
    Example: news.bbc.co.uk -> newsrss.bbc.co.uk
  • Web Accelerators
    Web Accelerators cache web pages and make it appear as if your Internet connection is faster. Since you are retrieving the website from the cache and not from the blocked website directly, you can access censored content.
    Example: webaccelerator.google.com

Things To Remember

  • There are a many ways to get access to a blocked site. Most methods do not allow you to do this securely. Find a method that provides you with both access and security.
  • The more private your circumvention solution the better. Regardless of the choice of technology, private solutions stand the best chance of not being discovered and blocked.
  • You increase your level of stable and secure circumvention if you are able to use a trusted out of country contact.
  • Never use an out of country contact you do not know and trust! Your contact can be your key to safety and your most important source of vulnerability.
  • Remember that your provider can potentially see everything you are doing through a circumvention system.
  • Violating state laws regarding Internet censorship can be a major risk. Do not use any technology you do not fully understand or know how to operate.
  • Make a through threat assessment based on your country context, skill level, and social network.
  • Make sure to understand fully the technology you are using. Some services advertize security and anonymity, but do not actually provide them or require extra configuration or fees in order to activate such features.

Further Reading

This guide was originally written by Ron Deibert for The Citizen Lab on October 22th, 2007 and entitled “Everyone’s Guide to By-Passing Internet Censorship for Citizens Worldwide“.

About The Citizen Lab

citizenlab_125.jpg

The Citizen Lab is an interdisciplinary laboratory based at the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto, Canada that engages in advanced research and development at the intersection of digital media and world civic politics.

A “hothouse” that brings together social scientists, computer scientists, activists, and artists, the Citizen Lab’s projects explore the political and social dimensions of new information and communication technologies with a focus on human rights, humanitarianism, and democratic change worldwide.

The civisec project is sponsored by the generous support of the Open Society Institute.

About the author

dilbert_125.jpg

Ron Deibert is Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto. He is a co-founder and a principal investigator of the OpenNet Initiative, a research and advocacy project that examines Internet censorship and surveillance worldwide, the CiviSec Project, which develops information security tools and strategies for human rights and humanitarian organizations worldwide, and is the principal investigator of the psiphon censorship circumvention project.

Are you looking for tools and services that can help you surf the Net without leaving trails of your personal data around? Do you want to experience the Internet freely but are still concerned with privacy issues? If so, you might be very interested in reading further. Photo credit: Germán Ariel Berra When we sit alone in front of our computer we have the sensation that our privacy is properly protected. However, every single move we make is constantly recorded by our Internet providers and by the servers that host the websites we visit. All the collected information is stored and often given away to third parties who will use it for their advantage (i.e. to display customized ads, to …

Since 5 march 2003, United States authorities have had access to most European airlines\’ passenger databases. According to this agreement – justified by the need to fight international terrorism – the European commission gives the USA online access to passenger name record (PNR) data of all Europe-based airline carriers for flights that go to, from or through the USA. Photo credit: Eduard Kachan The PNR data consist of all relevant information related to a passenger\’s flight: departure and return flights, connecting flights, special services required on board the flight (meals such as kosher or halal), payment information (such as the credit cards used to purchase the ticket) and e-mail address. EU forbids the transfer of personal data to other countries …

Digital Rights Management, or DRM, is an all-too-pervasive means by which the manufacturers of hardware and software - including music and video - place restrictions upon the people that buy it from them. If you have ever downloaded a music track from iTunes, or a movie from Amazon Unbox, bought an audio book from Audible or tried to get your music collection back off an iPod, you have already come into contact with DRM. Photo credit: Ovidiu Predescu Effectively, DRM is a means of controlling and restricting how you listen to, watch or interact with your digital media. For one, it is designed to prevent you from sharing it with your friends, and for another it is kept in place …

Everybody trusts Google - the name has become synonymous with web searches and contextual advertising, but mounting evidence leads some dissenters to ask the vital question ‘are my privacy and security at risk when using Google services?’

masterplan

This is also the contention of a new short film that attempts to unsettle your assumptions about everyone’s favourite web monopoly: Google.

Take Google Mail for instance - it is open knowledge that Gmail scans the contents of both incoming and outgoing mail, so that well targeted contextual advertising can be placed alongside your inbox. Gmail has been enormously popular, given that it is free, well featured and packs over two gigabytes of storage. But can you be one hundred percent certain that the mails scanned for the purposes of ad placement are not used for other purposes?

In this guide to Googlephobia, I have gathered a range of questions that are starting to be asked about the possible negative impact the web juggernaut might have on your life. In an age in which governments are attempting closer and closer surveillance and control of their citizens, can a private company be trusted to keep private information confidential?

Many would argue not, and yet many people persist in using email, online spreadsheets and documents, and web searches that could well be used against them at a later date. That’s right, even your web searches are stored deep down in the Google vaults, ready to pulled up and examined at a moment’s notice.

Capping this overview of Google’s less sunny side is the short film
http://masterplanthemovie.com/”>Master Plan, complete with a transcription by Executive Editor Livia Iacolare.

So sit back, survey the landscape, and decide for yourself if you have reason to be afraid. Here are the details:

Google and big brother

In trusting Google as your primary source of search information, or as an email, news, and even web application provider, how much are you exposing yourself to surveillance and possible manipulation? Just what information does Google have, and what are they willing to do with it?

Serge Thibodeau at Rank For Sales notes that:

…Google does record and store, as no doubt do other search engines, by individual details of everything searched through the Google engine.

This may be released where legally demanded or to satisfy national security or other state interests…

In other words should you be even so much as suspected of something illegal or of concern to government bodies, Google will happily oblige said bodies with full details of all of the searches you have run, and where they took you. This all comes down to how far you trust your government.

dossier

When Adam L. Penenberg researched Google for his Mother Jones article on the subject he directly questioned a Google official on the point of where the company stands with regards to handing out confidential information:

I asked her if the company had ever been subpoenaed for user records, and whether it had complied. She said yes, but wouldn’t comment on how many times. Google’s website says that as a matter of policy the company does “not publicly discuss the nature, number or specifics of law enforcement requests.”

So can you trust Google only as far as you can trust the Bush administration? “I don’t know,” Wong replied. “I’ve never been asked that question before.”

But Google’s complicity goes beyond subpoenas, according to ex-CIA intelligence agent Robert David Steele. Alex Jones at Prison Planet that:

Steele raised eyebrows when he confirmed from his contacts within the CIA and Google that Google was working in tandem with “the agency,” a claim made especially volatile by the fact that Google was recently caught censoring Alex Jones’ Terror Storm and has targeted other websites for blackout in the past.

“I think that Google has made a very important strategic mistake in dealing with the secret elements of the U.S. government - that is a huge mistake and I’m hoping they’ll work their way out of it and basically cut that relationship off,” said the ex-CIA man.

If Google is indeed in the pockets of shady intelligence agencies, how far can you truly trust them to keep your confidential data to themselves, and not turn it over at the drop of a hat?

‘Okay’, you might say, ‘but I have nothing to hide. The only people that this is going to worry are terrorists and pedophiles’. But whether you have nothing to hide or not, what is it stake here is a matter of civil liberties, the right to privacy and the possibility of state control and surveillance beyond anything known before. We are looking at the possibility of a huge escalation in the erosion of our personal freedom and privacy, beyond any security risks that might come about as a consequence.

But that’s not all.

Google everything

Google being in bed with big brother is a scary thought, but it isn’t such a monumental task to just switch to other services if it concerns you too much. But there are those that suggest that there may be little in the way of an alternative in the coming years, as Google’s master plan would seem to involve constant expansion and the creation of a monopolistic empire that ties up the web, telecommunications and television all in one. Where do you turn when everything has a Google badge on it?

mailscan

Robert Cringely over at I, Cringely details this disturbing possibility - the idea that Google is looking to create a total monopoly not just on the web services that we use, but also our phones and televisions. In Cringely’s discussion of Google’s monopolistic masterplan he details the fact that Google controls more network fiber than any other organization, and that it is buying up data centers by the dozen across America. ‘So what?’ you might ask, but as Cringely goes on to argue, the implications are much graver than they might first look.

Internet use is changing rapidly. As the web moves from being a static medium of words and the occasional picture towards a dynamic medium stuffed full of video and audio, ISPs are facing a big challenge in terms of keeping up with users bandwidth needs. In the next few years the average web user is going to shift from using one or two gigabytes of bandwidth a month, to using the same amount in the average day. For the ISPs this means a huge increase in the bandwidth they are going to be serving up.

Bandwidth, of course, lies in the hands of those who control the network fiber, and increasingly this is going to mean Google. The consequences are simple:

We won’t know if we’re accessing the Internet or Google and for all practical purposes it won’t matter. Google will become our phone company, our cable company, our stereo system and our digital video recorder. Soon we won’t be able to live without Google, which will have marginalized the ISPs and assumed most of the market capitalization of all the service providers it has undermined — about $1 trillion in all — which places today’s $500 Google share price about eight times too low.

So, regardless of whether you trust the Google empire or not, chances are you are not going to have much of choice when it comes to going through them if you want to access the Internet, your phone, or television content.

Masterplan

Posing these questions with panache and style, the short film Master Plan pushes Googlephobia a step further, throwing up questions as to Google’s dicing with DNA, and relationship with the CIA. This student film, put together by Olan Halici and Jurgen Mayer for their Bachelor’s thesis, raises the bar and dares to ask the questions most of us would rather not think about:

Master Plan complete transcript

Google is the most powerful search engine on Earth.

Today, billions of users google for any kind of information. A former student’s project, now rules the World Wide Web. In 1997, Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed the so called “page rank”: a complex mathematical algorithm that ranks websites by their relevance.

This groundbreaking invention profoundly transformed access to information.

Google rapidly became the first choice for internet search. But, this was just the beginning. Today, Google ends huge profits by dominating online advertising; it is well on the way of becoming the most valuable company on the global market. But it isn’t just about money; these men pursue a great vision, a google master plan.

Any kind of information will be accessible to anybody controlled by Google itself, with the credo, “Don’t be evil”.

New features and products are constantly flying out of the Googleplex, all for free. Don’t you worry about your privacy? A perfect blend of software and hardware, called Googleware gives the company more computing power than anyone else.

Google stores the entire known web in its giant database, and there is more. Gmail offers 2.7 GB of free storage; it’s no secret. All your mails - including received mails from your friends - are scanned. Google is methodically collecting personal data in many more ways using cookies and account information merely to offer relevant text ads.

Google can create incredibly detailed dossiers on everyone of us. A former CIA agent claims that Google is cooperating under cover with the U.S government including the CIA. Through appearing to simply want the best for its users, Google has already begun to expand its online domination.

Total control, and not merely on the web. Google is conducting research in the fields of molecular biology and genetics. What if Google had an entire file on you? Even including your entire genetic data? Every human being would become completely transparent.

What do you think? Does Google really worry about our privacy?

Conclusions

dontbeevil.jpg

As Web 2.0 evolves people are increasingly switching their work-based and personal communications to online applications, such as those offered by Google. In so doing, you can afford yourself new freedoms - the freedom to access our information regardless of where you are in the world, the freedom to collaborate with others from remote locations, the freedom to forget about how much space you have left on your hard drive or where you put that elusive file.

But in reaping the benefits of these new freedoms, you also put yourself at risk of being spied on, reported on and sold down the line by companies that will always put the bottom line before their customers. As Google grows from strength to strength as a provider of web services and applications, but also as an owner of all important bandwidth, it would make sense to take stock of their growing monopoly and consider the consequences of the deal you enter into when you make use of their free software.

Google, as a leader in the Web 2.0 landscape, is all about facilitating communication and the free flow of information. But where is all of the information flowing to, and is it always to your benefit? Or that of those who would control and catalogue our everyday lives?

While sincerely hoping that this isn’t the case, it would be wise to allow for the possibility in our day to day actions online.

Additonal resources

If you want to read more on the subject of Google and its master plan, you might want to visit the following websites:

  • Is Google Evil?, Adam L. Penenberg’s investigative think-piece on the subject

  • Robert Cringely’s thoughts on the future of the Google monopoly
  • Is Google A Monopoly? from Evolving Trends
  • Google’s relationship with the CIA explored over at Infowars
  • The Masterplan movie website