Archive for Web 2.0
Online Video Annotation Takes A Giant Leap Forward: Meet The All-New Mojiti
Posted by: | Comments (1)Online video annotation has just taken a giant leap forward, giving you the opportunity to add subtitles, text, animated shapes and pointers, freehand text and drawings, images, webcam video and even RSS feeds directly into your web-hosted videos. Until now a range of online video annotation services have made it easy to take your source video and add subtitles, text bubbles and shapes, animated graphics and even voice-overs right from your browser. But none of them have combined all of these features, and added a great many more to the mix, until now. Today the latest release of Mojiti effectively gives you a simple-to-use mini-motion-graphics studio to play with, bringing to you a mixture of tools ranging from the incredibly …
At the end of 2006, Time magazine decided that its person of the year was "You". Yes, You. All the You\’s that create and rate content on heavy hitting sites such as MySpace, Wikipedia and YouTube. The reason behind this is that a shift has happened where content isn\’t generated or rated by experts anymore. Instead it\’s by everyday folk like you. Photo credit: Yuri Arcurs This is further back up by a recent Revolution survey showed that within the 16-44 age group: 48% have been to a blog site 26% have created their own blog 74% have rated or reviewed products, content or services User generated content is one of the key foundations of Web 2.0. (For those of …
Every week it seems to become a little bit easier to get involved in multimedia content delivery and syndication – whether through sharing videos using Youtube, photos through Flickr, or your thoughts using popular blogging platforms. The ability to upload, embed and easily share media content is now something we take for granted, but until now there hasn’t been an easy way to gather all of this content together into a personalized online channel. That is all about to change starting today.

YouTube was revolutionary in that it made it easy for all kinds of people to quickly upload their home-made video content, and let other people embed the resulting videos straight into their blogs and websites, or watch it directly from YouTube. Services like Slideroll made it easy to add soundtracks to your photo collections, and SPresent took the pain out of putting together great looking, animated presentations online. They are all great in their way, but they stand alone, and the content made using these tools functions in discrete, one-off units. One video (or playlist), one slide show, one presentation.
For those working in the field of video, Brightcove offers a great step forward in that it allows you to create your own Internet TV channel. This means that you can add video content as you go along, and the video player embedded in other peoples’ websites will update every time you add new content to your line up.
In this sense, content becomes dynamic, something that is forever changing and updating rather than displaying the same one-off information over and over again.
But what if the same idea were applied to a service that allowed you to create your own truly multimedia online channels featuring audio, images, video and text? And if this service allowed you not only to create multimedia content easily from your browser, but also pull it into your channel from all over the web, placing your favourite YouTube videos side by side with your own webcam introductions, photos, text and mp3s?
What you’d have is the world’s first multimedia content delivery and syndication tool.
Today, that tool was launched. In this full review of the service, I explain exactly how easy it is to put together your own content-rich, personalized Internet media channel. The details follow:
Introducing Splashcast

Splashcast – which officially launched in public beta at the DEMO conference today – is a media syndication service and more. The service offers an easy way for users to create and grab all kinds of media from around the web, and bring them together in an RSS-updated embeddable player.
If you think of the feel and ease of use of the ubiquitous YouTube player, you will be in the right ballpark. The major difference is that Splashcast takes things a thousand miles further down the line, bringing all kinds of content under your control, whether photos, mp3 audio, text or Internet video. Effectively, Splashcast makes you both a presenter and curator of online media content, which you can gather into new contexts, for new audiences.
In the following video introduction (1′ 49″), Splashcast’s Director of Content (and veteran tech blogger) Marshall Kirkpatrick talks you through the basics of what Splashcast is, and what it aims to do:
The ultimate web widget

What makes Splashcast so refreshing is the way that it combines the video-embedding trend popularized by YouTube with the flexibility, content syndication and ease of use of web widgets.
A major breakthrough in the evolution of Web 2.0 has been the ability to easily share and recontextualize online media and data to suit the needs of different audiences at different times. By plugging different media players and micro-applications directly into websites and blogs, it has become a cinch to add rich content that adds value and interest to site visitors.
But having a page full of separate videos, maps, RSS aggregators and other plug-in tools can be wearing on the most capable broadband connection, and there is something counterintuitive about placing videos and widgets in a vertical line down the body of a blog post or MySpace page.
With the Splashcast player, you ultimately hand over more control to your site visitor, who instead of having to wait for six videos and a couple of widgets to load, can go straight to a single player and choose from a range of mixed-media content. Maybe they want to go through your photo-collection, or listen to a podcast you have put together, but then again, maybe all they are interested in is your selection of hand-picked YouTube videos. With Splashcast embedded into your website, it’s as simple as choosing from an intuitive channel guide that will be familiar to anyone that has ever used cable TV.

What we have here is a simple way to have your content splashed out across the farthest reaches of the web, while keeping it totally under your control. Make one change from your console, and regardless of how many thousands of people have tapped into your online media channel, that content is going to be instantly updated in every single player. That’s quite an achievement on the part of the Splashcast team.
Creating, syndicating and displaying content

Putting content together has been made very easy indeed, and one of the things that really sets Splashcast apart is the range of media that you can draw on in creating your online channel. To break this down, you are given the option to use the following types of content:
- Audio files – which can be brought in from a URL, uploaded from your browser, or searched for from within Splashcast.
Any number of these files can uploaded to your ’show’, and sequenced as you see fit. You are also given the option of choosing whether there will be a fade in / fade out between discrete items, and if you would like items to auto-advance after a certain time, or wait for the user to click before moving to the next item in line.
Sequencing your mixed media components is as simple as dragging and dropping them into the position you want them within your playlist. You might begin with a still photo, with accompanying background music (this is another option – the ability to choose a background music track that will play underneath your media elements), before moving onto a video, and finishing with a transcript or summary of the video.
A fifth option allows you to bring whole RSS feeds in either from Flickr or YouTube. These can be put together using a range of parameters, including keyword and username searches that will bring back the content you are looking to collect. So if you have a collection of videos all gathered under a YouTube username, this provides a great shortcut for you to import the lot into a compilation ’show’.
The ability to choose the size of the player will make this a great tool for the display of portfolios, web-comics and other visual media that will be able to make the most of the combination of still and motion elements. The biggest drawback with a lot of the current video sharing services is the inability to determine the size of the player window.
Splashcast have taken a big step forward here, and offer player sizes that range from the standard 320 x 240 online video resolution right up to a much more accommodating 800 x 600. If it wasn’t enough that you can select from a vast range of preset sizes, it is also possible to create a player according to your own custom parameters. Given that different websites, and even types of content, call for differing display sizes, this seems like an essential aspect of online media publishing, and yet few others have picked up on it. Hopefully, those that emulate or draw on Spashcast’s well thought out design in the future will take this into account.
In short, then, Splashcast makes it easy to quickly put together mixed-media, multi-file content from around the web, and bring it to a single destination.
The Russian doll effect – granular differentiation of content

Different users of the service will have different needs for it, and Splashcast offers a good degree of flexibility in terms of how it is used. Effectively, what you have is a granular means to either aggregate or differentiate your content. Content is ordered on four basic levels, one nested inside the other like a Russian doll:
- Discrete media files – your starting point for any use of Splashcast is the raw material you will either source from elsewhere, or record directly into the console. Initially what you have is a bunch of photos, video, audio and text with not much of a relationship.
What I want to point out here is that Splashcast is very scalable, and will readily adapt to the needs of both the social networking crowd, and those looking to put together professionally produced or aggregated mixed-media content.
If this all makes it sound needlessly complicated, and all you are really looking for is the ability to throw together some YouTube clips and put them on your MySpace page, Splashcast will not give you any problems in doing so. In fact, the whole process feels very intuitive.
Nevertheless, should you wish to use Splashcast to create an independent network of syndicated content, this is also well within the service’s reach. In short, then, Splashcast is incredibly scalable and has been built to cater to a range of users.
The interface

The Splashcast console’s interface has been well thought through, and will take you step by step through the process of adding, switching and tracking the success of your content. The very clear graphical dimension of the interface features colourful, easily identifiable icons that leave little room for confusion. If I want to add video content, I click on the movie camera, and make my selection from the well illustrated list of video options. I feel confident that I could find my way around the console if it was written entirely in a different language, and that is a good thing in terms of overall usability.
In addition to the use of these clear icons, text-box hints appear for almost anything on screen that my cursor rolls-over, so that I am constantly being guided through the process of putting together my custom media channel. There is never a point in the process that – even as a complete newcomer to the service – I feel out of my depth, or confused as to what I should be doing next. There are a good few media sharing services that could learn a thing or two here.
Putting together a selection of media files to make a ’show’ is drag-and-drop easy, and importing these media components – from your own computer, or from an online source – is made utterly painless from start to finish.
From the end-user perspective, the Splashcast player itself is well designed. All menu options fade away if I move my cursor outside of the player’s window, which allows for full, uninterrupted images and video. With the cursor inside the window, I gain access to the usual video controls, the ability to quickly skip back and forth from one media file to the next (rather like skipping scenes on a DVD player), along with menu controls that allow me to subscribe to the channel, leave comments along with a number of other options.
What I’d like to see next

It’s hard to find room for critique of what is already a very polished and well put-together service, despite having only just entered the public beta phase. The fact that the service is in the early stages of its beta release means that there are still some questions waiting to be answered.
Chief among them for independent media publishers will be the issue of monetization. As YouTube have just announced their intended use of advertising, and the resultant revenue-sharing they have planned, it seems that monetization is no longer something that can be ignored by Web 2.0 start-up companies. At the time of writing, the Splashcast team have not arrived at a monetization model, although they have expressed an interest in avoiding pre- and post-roll advertising – the insertion of videos or advertising images before or after a clip.
At this stage that certainly isn’t a problem, and it makes good sense for the service to build an active community and develop their service before deciding on such an important issue. However, in a competitive marketplace consumers (and especially those looking to produce professional quality content) are increasingly coming to expect compensation for their work.
Given that Splashcast has such rich potential for the creation of entire mixed-media networks, channels and shows, this would definitely seem like an important step for them to consider before too long.
In conclusion

Splashcast’s chief appeal is in its ability to bring together a range of content, regardless of medium, and recontextualize it for specific audiences. By putting at your finger tips an easy-to-use toolkit for the creation and aggregation of text, audio, photo and video based content Splashcast have succeeded in creating a unique venture with a whole lot of appeal.
Added to this groundbreaking creation of the world’s first multimedia content delivery and syndication player, the inclusion of RSS at the heart of the service is the cherry on the cake. What this effectively means is that as a content producer, you can change, update and overhaul your content from a single online destination, and have the resulting content instantly relayed to your global online audience. Every show, every change in your line-up, every addition to your network will be instantly beamed to the Splashcast players embedded in the websites of your audience. Now that it’s here, it all seems so obvious – but then, the best inventions always do.
Reading blogs site visitors have come to expect the ability to receive instantaneous updates every time new content is published.
They have also come to expect the inclusion of rich media components, whether in the form of mp3 players, embedded video, or any number of web widgets. The age of text and scant images are coming to a close.
What makes Splashcast so groundbreaking is that it brings these expectations to the world of multimedia. Now I come to think of it, why shouldn’t my media players update as often as my news feeds? Why shouldn’t I be able to bring my photo collection into dialogue with a video I just shot, and that video into contrast with last night’s TV news? Splashcast have taken the mashup and made it as accessible as Internet video. I can’t wait to see what they’re going to come up with next.
Additional resources
If this review has made you hungry for more information about Splashcast, you might want to take a look at the following websites:
Socialtext Unplugged is leading the way in adding a whole new level of flexibility to the world of web-based applications, by pioneering ways in which you will be able to work seamlessly with your favourite web apps even when you are not Internet-connected.

Photo credit: Dusan Jankovic
Only a few years ago we were bound to our desktops, or forced to carry peripherals with us on every journey out of the office. But with the recent advent of Web applications, we are now able, like never before, to collaborate, create and share content quickly and efficiently no matter from where we connect and from which computer we log on to the Internet. The rapid proliferation of web-based applications has rapidly expanded our computer-assisted work capabilities, making it possible for anyone to work directly from a standard web browser, and independently of the location and computer type used.
Web applications, have indeed increased productivity and flexibility by storing your data online, and allowing you to access it from just about any computer connected to the Internet. With it, you can access your Google Docs, Zoho Projects and SPresent presentations whether you’re in Rio, Rome or New York.
But while it is definitely true that you can work on your spreadsheet in the morning in London, and finish it off in the evening when you touch down in Tokyo, but what about those long hours spent twiddling your thumbs on the plane journey over?
Sure, I can import and export my Google Spreadsheets to and from Excel, but I want to be able to click a button and edit them straight from my browser, using the same interface, with none of the inevitable glitches and bugs that come from importing and exporting files.

Yes, it’s great that I can import Powerpoint files into SPresent. And I appreciate being able to save and load my presentations, I really do. But wouldn’t it be great if I could keep on editing them on my tablet PC, and have them all synced up, online and ready to share as soon as I was within wi-fi range?
Until wireless Internet is totally ubiquitous – and we have a good way to go before that’s going to be the case – a new solution may come to your rescue: the offline web application.
Thanks to the pioneering work being done at Socialtext, the maker of one of the most popular business enterprise wiki solutions today, I have prepared a short video review that will walk you through the simple process of taking your enterprise wiki with you, even when you have to completely forfeit your Internet connection.
Here the details:
Socialtext – bringing the enterprise wiki to the next level

One of Socialtext’s biggest achievements was in bringing the wiki to everyday people and professionals that might otherwise have been put off by the hassle of learning ‘Wiki Markup‘. In short, if you decide you want to edit Wikipedia, for instance, you are going to need to learn how to format your text, in what is basically a simplified version of HTML code. Not everyone’s bag.
Socialtext, on the other hand, made it possible to edit your wiki as if you were using a word processor, dispensing of the code altogether and replacing it with it a simple, intuitive WYSIWYG (what-you-see-is-what-you-get) interface. Suddenly, wikis were hot news on the enterprise scene and not just the remit of geeks.
But after a while we realized that for all the beauty and benefit that web applications were bringing to us, a new, scary demon, was again lurking into our future. By becoming so enamoured with the use of web apps we were chaining ourselves to the need of an always-on connection, as in the lack of it, none of the marvels achieved by web-based apps could be kept running.
And, let’s face it: despite all the talk of MuniFi, we are still a long way from having free, always-on, ubiquitous Internet access. There are plenty of times when we just can’t get online, including those long plane journeys.
Offline web applications offer a way of freeing you up to work on your projects wherever you choose to be. Train, car, bus or airplane make no difference once your preferred web apps give you the opportunity to keep working even when the web connection is not there anymore.
With offline web apps, you can sit in the park with your laptop, and make those quick edits in the shade of a tree. Then, when you head home, you can sync up all of your work with the simple click of a button.
Video micro-review
In this video micro-review I take you through the simple process you will go through in transporting your wiki to your desktop, for easy, fully functional offline editing.
The process described here is a very simple one.
Let’s say you’re working on your wiki online, and have to go catch a plane.
All you have to do, as I demonstrate, is:
- Save your file as you would usually
The TiddlyWiki connection

It’s worth briefly mentioning that Socialtext Unplugged was developed by the Socialtext team in collaboration with Jeremy Ruston of Osmosoft, the creators of the simple free software TiddlyWiki.
The connection between SocialText Unplugged and TiddlyWiki is evident, as Mr Ruston’s brainchild provides a simple, free micro-wiki that creates self-contained HTML pages which can be carried around or placed on a key drive. It’s ‘wiki on a stick’ as the TiddlyWiki team would have it.
Further, the adoption and integration of the TiddlyWiki simple and open-source software solution into SocialText, Ross Mayfield and his team have shown themselves to have their ear to the ground when it comes to make the best and most intelligent use of open-source software for commercial purposes.
Taking advantage of this existing technology, and integrating it within the Socialtext schema was a smart move indeed, and a commendable one.
It is easy for developers to rest on their laurels once they have reached a certain degree of success, and Socialtext’s commitment to staying involved with the latest, evolving open-source projects is testament to their forward-thinking approach.
The case for online / offline web apps
Without a shadow of doubt, I confirm my prediction that offline web apps will be a key, increasingly popular theme during 2007.
While for now the number of offline web apps is very limited (personal organizer Scrybe is another offline web application contender, offering an interesting alternative implementation of this same idea), developers are already on the case of making offline web apps happen in a “big” way in the months to come.
The ability to to sync data – beyond any existing import and exporting facility, is the key here. What in fact makes Socialtext Unplugged stand out is the fact that I can start working online, continue offline seamlessly, (and with no noticeable difference in performance), and then sync all of the data I have worked and modified with a single click.
The more companies like SocialText will work on refining usability and interface design in order to make ushc offline work as transparent as saving a file, the more offline web application will catch on.
Make the process counterintuitive and complicated and the idea will fall flat on its face.
Conclusion

Socialtext has taken a bold first move in making available one of the first enterprise-elevel offline web applications. This not a bug-free and highly refined tool, but it won’t take long before any of the rough corners will be cleared.
2007 is bound to see a raft of companies following Unplugged and the idea of the offline web app further.
As both free and enterprise web applications catch on to the benefits that can be offered to end-users via the development of always-on web apps, we will see the seamless bridging of the online and offline worlds.
Socialtext has achieved a lot more besides so far, but the introduction of online / offline, work anywhere wikis at the enterprise level is trailblazing stuff, that will doubtless be imitated in the coming months by other developers in the expanding web application field.
This could well be the final nail in the desktop application’s coffin.
N.B.: SocialText Unplugged is still in Beta and it awaits further improvements and refinements.
Additional resources
If you are interested in learning more about Socialtext Unplugged and the Online / Offline web application phenomenon, you might want to take a look at the following websites:
- Try out Socialtext Unplugged for yourself at their open-source wiki
Ad-Supported Open-Source Community Blogging Becomes Reality: OpenServing Is Here
Posted by: | Comments (173)Social media defined the last year of developments across the web, with social bookmarking, news, networks and community blogging rising into the ascendant. The web has transformed itself, moving forward from one-way, static communication into a sphere dominated by democratic, peer-driven content unfolding in a dynamic conversation between its users.

Open-Source culture has also played an integral role in this unfolding landscape, with success stories such as Wikipedia tapping into the wisdom of crowds to maximize its enormous range of information. Wherever you look, users have become active participants, rather than passive audiences.
While the Open-Source, democratic media ideal certainly gives us a warm fuzzy feeling inside, however, it doesn’t always pay the bills. As this new web evolves, so new ways to monetize our content grow with it. Leading the way, of course, is contextual advertising.
What if the power of this Open-Source, socially-driven web could be used to create free, networked content, while offering an opportunity for community webmasters to make some money from the proceedings? This is the thinking behind a new, totally free service that promises to bring the power of community blogging and social news sites like Digg to anyone with the time and patience needed to set up such a community.
Open Serving is the solution, and while the service offers 100% free hosting, bandwidth costs and the Open-Source software that will run your community for you, it also promises to turn over 100% of ad profits made from your site directly to you. That’s right, 100%. All of it.
In this brief introduction I walk you through the key features of what looks to be a very promising social news and community blogging platform, with the rich potential to reward those that put it to good use.
User generated content

User generated content – also known as consumer generated media – has transformed the new media landscape. Newspapers, TV networks and web developers alike are clambering over one another to get at this rich source of content – that produced by the people formerly known as the audience.
It is certainly possible for a website to survive without a community element and the input of its site visitors, but to really thrive in the Web 2.0 environment, integrating their creative or critical powers into your product is at least desirable.
OpenServing gives you the opportunity to build a community from scratch, or to create an easy to use community space for your existing site visitors, thus extending the range and breadth of what you are able to offer them.
The platform is driven by its users, and while you are in control as the site administrator, with the ability to edit and determine the nature of the content, your users are nevertheless going to play an active role in the day to day content of your ‘OpenServe’ – the company’s name for your collaborative blog. With OpenServing, any user can add an ‘opinion’ – a short blog post – and these opinions will make up the essence of your community dominated website.
Let’s say you decide to set up an OpenServe about online collaboration tools, for instance. You have chosen the topic, and you will have final control over the content, but ultimately you are one contributor among the many of your community. If successful, this makes for a stream of fresh, user generated content pouring into your OpenServe. A horde of voices gather, each bringing something unique to the table.
The more cautious among you will at this point be wondering what happens to quality control if this is the case. How does the good content get seen if it is hidden among a growing pile of garbage? The answer, in this case, is via the process of user democracy.
Democratic content serving

Shamelessly ripping off Digg’s central idea of news items voted on by site visitors, OpenServe relies heavily on a voting system. Rather than content being selected by a single editor, it is instead voted on by those taking part in the community.
The result is simple, and will be familiar to any Digg-ites – the most popular content makes it to the front page. News, or blogging, becomes viral, and the more people interested in what an individual has to say will propel their content to the forefront of the site, bringing it to more people’s attention.
There is nothing new here, but I am inclined to say that if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it. This has been a very effective method for Digg and seems very much in keeping with the democratic, Open-Source ethos behind the OpenServing project.
In actual fact, they have managed to take things one step further by extending the democratic voting process to the management of comments.
Comment-level control

So while traditionally the webmaster is responsible for filtering spam, and authenticating comments, here the task is to an extent handed over to the community at large. Just as ‘opinions’ can be voted on, so individual comments find their place in the ecosystem by means of user votes.
This way, the best comments literally rise to the top, and those of little interest sink down into the depths. This is a nice touch, and extends the already profoundly social nature of the platform. As the person responsible for your online community, then, you are much less and uber-editor or circus master as you are a gardener gently pruning and refining the organic content growing up around you. This is how communities prosper.
Of course the added benefit of being the person behind the community is the ability to profit from any ad-revenue generated by your users.
Advertising revenue

The ad revenue, generated via Google, goes straight into your pocket if you have (or get hold of) a Google Ad code. This is not to be scoffed at, as obviously you are getting completely free bandwidth, the tools to create and maintain your community, and storage space to host it for nothing. And then, on top of all of that, you are entitled to the full 100% of any profits made from pay-per-click click-throughs.
Again, while this is unlikely to make you a millionaire, there is the very real possibility that with time you could stand to profit considerably from your involvement with the platform. This will obviously be to the extent that your community grows and prospers, but I can see this amazing feature of the platform drawing in sharp-minded people with their eye on the money. Fortunately, as users will be drawn by the quality of content and community, there seem to be no loopholes for those that would try to create communities on a flimsy pretext.
Ultimately, a community is as strong as its user-base and content, and those that are likely to see the most rewards from the ad revenue potential of OpenServing will be those that spend the most time and effort on developing a rock solid community.
Wikia – the people behind the project

So who are these philanthropists handing out bandwidth, storage space and free software without taking a fat cut of your profits? The people behind OpenServing are Wikia Inc, and they have long been providing free community wikis using the MediaWiki platform most famous for running Wikipedia.
In effect, OpenServing is part of the same vision that brought us Wikipedia. OpenServing is the brainchild of the same people. Co-Founder Jimmy Wales says of the project that:
”Social change has accelerated beyond the original Wikipedia concept of six years ago. People are rapidly adopting new conventions for working together to do great things, and Wikia is a major beneficiary of that trend.
OpenServing is the next phase of this experiment. We don’t have all the business model answers, but we are confident – as we always have been – that the wisdom of our community will prevail
”
Jimmy Wales, 2006. Wikia Press Release
It is refreshing to hear of a project that is driven by the will to further disseminate knowledge and hand over the tools of production to everyday people, even if the business model may be trailing behind those admirable ideals.
I don’t doubt that OpenServing will find its business model over time. But if Wales’ track history is anything to go by, it will not be an intrusive one. I look forward to seeing a solution evolve here, and am sure that the communities contributing to this Open-Source project will find ways to make it sustainable. Wikia, in many ways the platforms predecessor, is now enjoying its fifth year, and seems to be going strong. OpenServing promises to be even more successful.
Possible drawbacks

OpenServing is powered by MediaWiki, the Open-Source platform that serves up Wikipedia, which is great.
One potential issue I can see – and this is yet to be confirmed – is the inability to use web video. The name MediaWiki is perhaps a little misleading in this sense, in that it draws the line at rich media. As Internet video continues to dominate the evolving web, it would be nice to see video embedding as standard, as this is proving to be an increasingly popular way to share content. Time will tell if this will be included or not, but initial indications suggest that video will not be part of the OpenServing equation.
This is not the end of the world, and OpenServing has been designed to support existing blogs and websites with an easy to plug in, freely hosted community blogging and news platform. Nevertheless, social media are increasingly driven by audio-visual content, and if communities are to be successful in terms of ad-revenue and user retention, this would be a nice addition.
In conclusion

OpenServing is set up to offer a very rich experience to those with the power to bring, or grow, a community in the sub-domain of their choice. While it is unlikely that the platform will be producing any millionaires in the near future, there is something very cool about being able to create what is effectively your very own Digg and take home any profits made from the advertising. This is a bold project, and deserves to be applauded for not taking a cut for itself.
Ad-revenue aside, the service provides an excellent, very easy to use platform for extending the social dimension of your personal blog or even company website, and the range of applications for the service seem diverse. Companies could use the service to engage with customers, or indeed colleagues while independent publishers will certainly benefit from the ability to create communities around their content.
Finally, what needs to be reiterated is that OpenServing is totally free. There are very few services out there without some economic catch, but this would seem to be on of the rare exceptions. You really have nothing to lose in registering your OpenServing sub-domain, and should you have the time, energy and talent to foster a community, it would seem that there is a lot to gain – in terms of direct ad revenues, but also in terms of forging communities and strengthening your cause and online presence.
For this alone, OpenServing deserves to be applauded.
Additional resources
If you would like to learn more, or get involved with setting up your own OpenServing community, you might be interested in the following links:
- OpenServing.com – the homepage of the service
IP Telephony Marries The Web: Voice 2.0 – A Manifesto For The Future
Posted by: | Comments Comments OffWe're witnessing the beginnings of a titanic clash between the Internet and the telecommunications industry. My hope is that clash will be the, albeit painful, evolution of Voice into a full blow internet application – the birth of Voice 2.0. Voice 2.0 is the next step from where we are today. DVD Cover – Clash of the Titans Amazon DVD In today's world, VoIP "carriers" like Vonage, Packet8, and the cable offerings, are migrations of the legacy PSTN onto a VoIP foundation. Voice 2.0 â true VoIP â is the marriage of IP Telephony to the Web. It's already begun. The arrival (and mass adoption) of technologies like Skype, Peerio, and PhoneGnome are one indicator. Another is the accelerating loss…